최신 L6M1 무료덤프 - CIPS Strategic Ethical Leadership

See the Answer is the explanation
Explanation:
(A) Five Qualities of an Effective Leader (10 Points)
Effective leadership is crucial for the success of any organization, particularly in strategic procurement and supply chain management. Below are five key qualities that define an effective leader:
Vision and Strategic Thinking (2 Points)
A successful leader has a clear vision for the future and can develop strategic plans to achieve organizational goals.
In procurement, this means aligning supply chain strategies with overall business objectives, such as cost reduction, sustainability, and supplier relationship management.
Integrity and Ethical Leadership (2 Points)
Ethical leaders act with honesty, transparency, and fairness, setting high ethical standards for their teams.
In procurement, integrity ensures fair supplier selection, compliance with procurement laws, and avoiding corruption or conflicts of interest.
Decision-Making and Problem-Solving Skills (2 Points)
Leaders must analyze complex situations, consider different perspectives, and make informed decisions.
In supply chain management, this involves risk assessment, supplier negotiation, and resolving disruptions (e.g., supply shortages, logistics issues, or geopolitical risks).
Communication and Influence (2 Points)
An effective leader clearly communicates the organization's goals and expectations to internal and external stakeholders.
In procurement, this involves negotiating contracts, managing supplier relationships, and ensuring cross-functional collaboration within the organization.
Emotional Intelligence and People Management (2 Points)
Emotional intelligence (EQ) includes self-awareness, empathy, motivation, and social skills, which are essential for managing teams.
In procurement, this helps leaders build trust, motivate employees, and handle conflicts with suppliers or internal teams effectively.
(B) Role of a Leader in Procurement and Supply Chain Functions (15 Points) Leaders in procurement and supply chain management play a crucial strategic role in ensuring the efficiency, sustainability, and ethical integrity of the organization's supply chain. Below are five key roles a leader plays:
Setting Strategic Direction in Procurement (3 Points)
A leader defines procurement objectives in line with corporate strategy, such as cost reduction, supplier diversity, risk management, and sustainability.
Example: A Chief Procurement Officer (CPO) may implement a strategy to reduce reliance on a single supplier and diversify sourcing to minimize risks.
Ensuring Ethical and Sustainable Procurement (3 Points)
Leaders must establish and enforce ethical procurement policies to avoid fraud, bribery, or unethical supplier practices.
Example: Ensuring compliance with Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) initiatives, such as sourcing from ethical suppliers who follow fair labor practices.
Supplier Relationship and Risk Management (3 Points)
A leader is responsible for building strong supplier relationships that foster trust, reliability, and long-term partnerships.
They also identify and mitigate risks in the supply chain, such as supply disruptions, geopolitical risks, and financial instability of suppliers.
Driving Innovation and Continuous Improvement (3 Points)
Leaders encourage teams to adopt innovative technologies such as Artificial Intelligence (AI), blockchain, and data analytics in procurement.
Example: Implementing e-procurement systems to enhance efficiency and transparency in supplier transactions.
Developing and Empowering the Procurement Team (3 Points)
A leader must focus on talent development, upskilling procurement professionals, and fostering a culture of continuous learning.
Example: Providing training on contract management, negotiation skills, and supplier evaluation techniques to enhance team capabilities.

See the Answer is the explanation
Explanation:
Overall explanation
Below you will find how you can plan and draft the essay. Remember this is an example of one way you could approach the question. At Level 6 the questions are much more open so your response may be completely different and that's okay.
Essay Plan
Introduction - complex area of law
Section 1 - each type of dismissal, explain and example
Section 2- what they should do; use internal channels first, seek advice (union / Citizens Advice), mediation, litigation via Employment Tribunal.
Example Essay
Employment termination is a complex area of employment law, and different types of dismissal carry distinct legal implications. In the United Kingdom, where employment law is well-established, employees are entitled to certain rights and protections when facing dismissal. This essay explores various types of dismissal, including fair dismissal, unfair dismissal, summary dismissal, constructive dismissal, and redundancy. It also discusses how employees should respond if they believe they have been unfairly dismissed.
Types of Dismissal:
Fair Dismissal: Fair dismissal occurs when an employer terminates an employee's contract with valid reasons that are recognized by law. Common grounds for fair dismissal include misconduct, lack of capability and statutory reasons. For example, an employee consistently failing to perform their job despite adequate training and support may be fairly dismissed for capability.
Unfair Dismissal: Unfair dismissal, on the other hand, happens when an employee is terminated without valid reasons or if the employer fails to follow the correct dismissal procedures. Employees with at least two years of continuous service have protection against unfair dismissal. For example if XYZ Ltd fire Employee X who has worked at the company for 5 years because there is a personality clash between them and the management, Employee X could claim unfair dismissal (personality clash is not a valid reason for dismissal).
Summary Dismissal: Summary dismissal, often referred to as instant or gross misconduct dismissal, occurs when an employer terminates an employee's contract without notice due to severe misconduct. It typically involves serious breaches of workplace rules or the law. For example if an employee is caught stealing, they may be fired on the spot without notice.
Constructive Dismissal: Constructive dismissal occurs when an employee resigns from their position due to an employer's fundamental breach of the employment contract, creating an unbearable working environment. An example of this is if the employer fails to provide the worker with the correct PPE to complete the work (for example in the Construction industry). Because the employee is unable to complete the work safely, they resign. In this instance, the 'blame' is put firmly on the fault of the employer for 'making' the employee resign.
Redundancy: Redundancy takes place when an employer dismisses an employee because the job role they held no longer exists, or the employer's business needs to reduce its workforce. Redundancy dismissals must adhere to specific procedures and fair selection criteri a. In the UK this is referred to as TUPE.
If an employee believes that they are being fired unfairly they can claim unfair dismissal. Firstly, they should initially consider raising their concerns internally through the company's grievance procedure. This allows for a formal process where grievances can be investigated and addressed. This is particularly useful in large organisations where workers may be fired by middle-managers who are not properly trained or aware of the legislation regarding this area. By raising a concern through a grievance policy, it allows the right people in the company such as HR or the senior leadership team, to fully assess the situation.
Secondly, the employee should seek advice from an organisation such as Citizen's Advice or their workers' union. They will be able to advise if the situation does amount to unfair dismissal. Getting a third party involved can help to bring in a new perspective and keep discussions positive and moving forward.
If it is believed that the unfair dismissal has merit, employees can contact ACAS (Advisory, Conciliation, and Arbitration Service) for early conciliation. ACAS may facilitate settlement discussions between the employee and employer to avoid legal proceedings. If internal processes and ACAS conciliation do not resolve the matter, employees can file a claim with the Employment Tribunal within specified time limits, asserting unfair dismissal. The time limit to claim is currently 3 months minus a day from the date you were dismissed. Employees may seek legal advice and representation during Employment Tribunal proceedings to ensure their rights are protected and they receive appropriate compensation if the claim is successful.
In conclusion, various types of dismissal exist, each with distinct legal implications. Employees should be aware of their rights and protections under UK employment law, particularly concerning unfair dismissal. It is important to remember that 'employment rights' in the UK are only granted after 2 years of service, and this is often a big factor when looking at this area of law. It is important for all employees in the UK to understand these types of dismissal as having appropriate responses empowers employees to seek redress when faced with unjust termination.

See the Answer is the explanation
Explanation:
Introduction
Leadership is a critical factor in shaping employee performance, motivation, and overall organizational success. In procurement, managers must adopt a leadership style that aligns with their team's capabilities, business objectives, and operational challenges. Two widely recognized leadership styles are Transformational Leadership and Transactional Leadership, each with distinct characteristics and effects on team performance.
This essay will discuss both leadership styles, outlining their advantages and disadvantages. It will then evaluate which approach is best suited for Mo, a procurement manager facing skill and confidence issues among his team members.
Understanding Transformational Leadership
Definition
Transformational leadership is a leadership style that focuses on inspiring, motivating, and developing employees to reach their full potential. Transformational leaders act as mentors and role models, encouraging innovation, professional growth, and long-term performance improvements.
Key Characteristics of Transformational Leadership
Inspiration and Motivation - The leader encourages employees to perform beyond expectations through a compelling vision.
Individualized Support - Focuses on mentoring and coaching employees to enhance their skills.
Encourages Innovation - Employees are empowered to think creatively and solve problems.
Develops Future Leaders - Focuses on long-term talent development rather than short-term task completion.
High Engagement and Emotional Intelligence - Builds strong relationships with employees and fosters a positive workplace culture.
Advantages of Transformational Leadership
✅ Encourages professional growth - Employees develop new skills and gain confidence.
✅ Increases motivation and job satisfaction - Employees feel valued and supported.
✅ Promotes innovation and continuous improvement - Encourages employees to think creatively.
✅ Builds long-term organizational success - Creates future leaders through mentoring and skill development.
Disadvantages of Transformational Leadership
❌ Time-consuming - Requires significant time and effort for mentoring and development.
❌ Not suitable for urgent performance issues - If immediate performance improvement is needed, transformational leadership may be too slow.
❌ Employees may resist change - Some employees may be unwilling to embrace coaching and new expectations.
Understanding Transactional Leadership
Definition
Transactional leadership is a leadership style based on a structured, performance-driven approach. It focuses on clear expectations, rewards for success, and consequences for underperformance. This style is best suited for improving task efficiency, enforcing compliance, and ensuring consistency.
Key Characteristics of Transactional Leadership
Clear Expectations and Rules - Employees have defined roles and responsibilities.
Performance-Based Rewards and Punishments - Good performance is rewarded, while poor performance is corrected through disciplinary actions.
Focus on Efficiency and Results - Emphasizes productivity and operational efficiency over employee growth.
Short-Term Performance Goals - Ensures immediate improvements in employee performance.
Hierarchy and Structure - Follows a strict chain of command.
Advantages of Transactional Leadership
✅ Ensures short-term efficiency and compliance - Clearly defines expectations, which leads to immediate improvements in performance.
✅ Effective for structured tasks - Employees know exactly what is expected, reducing uncertainty.
✅ Increases accountability - Employees are held responsible for meeting targets.
✅ Useful for crisis management - Provides a clear directive in high-pressure situations.
Disadvantages of Transactional Leadership
❌ Limited employee development - Focuses more on task completion rather than skill enhancement.
❌ Can reduce creativity and innovation - Employees may feel restricted by rigid expectations.
❌ May reduce motivation - Over-reliance on rules and punishments can create a negative work environment.
❌ Not ideal for building long-term talent - Employees may not develop leadership skills or confidence.
Which Leadership Style is Most Suitable for Mo?
Case Study Analysis: Mo's Leadership Challenge
Mo is a procurement manager leading a team of 5 procurement assistants.
The assistants are underperforming due to lack of skills and confidence.
Mo is concerned about their ability to complete procurement tenders accurately.
Evaluating the Best Leadership Approach for Mo

Based on the specific challenges Mo is facing, neither leadership style alone is perfect. Instead, a combined approach is most suitable:
Recommended Approach: A Blend of Transformational and Transactional Leadership Short-Term Approach: Transactional Leadership for Immediate Performance Improvement Mo should set clear expectations and enforce accountability to ensure the assistants improve their performance in procurement tenders.
Implement a structured training program with performance benchmarks.
Use performance-based incentives (e.g., bonuses, recognition for accurate work).
Provide constructive feedback on mistakes to encourage learning.
Long-Term Approach: Transformational Leadership for Skill Development and Confidence Mo should act as a mentor and coach, providing continuous learning opportunities.
Encourage assistants to develop confidence in procurement by assigning them progressively challenging tasks.
Inspire the team by highlighting the importance of procurement excellence in achieving organizational goals.
Implement peer learning and mentorship programs to create a supportive learning environment.
Conclusion
Both Transformational Leadership and Transactional Leadership offer valuable benefits, but in the case of Mo's underperforming team, a blended approach is the most effective strategy.
Transactional Leadership should be used in the short term to improve immediate performance, enforce accountability, and ensure accuracy in procurement tenders.
Transformational Leadership should be introduced gradually to develop skills, boost confidence, and foster long-term career growth among the procurement assistants.
By combining both approaches, Mo can quickly improve his team's performance while ensuring they gain the necessary skills and confidence to succeed in procurement. This balanced leadership approach ensures short-term efficiency and long-term growth, making it the most effective strategy for Mo's situation.

See the Answer is the explanation
Explanation:
Overall explanation
Below you will find how you can plan and draft the essay. Remember this is an example of one way you could approach the question. At Level 6 the questions are much more open so your response may be completely different and that's okay.
Essay Plan
Introduction - definition of power and Max Weber
P1 - charismatic power
P2 - rational/ legal
P3 - using power responsibly: training others, accountability/ setting procedures, ethical sourcing Conclusion - procurement has a lot of power in an organisation. The key to using power is 'balance' and using it responsibly Example Essay Power, in the context of organizations, refers to the ability of individuals or departments to influence decisions, actions, and outcomes. Max Weber, a German Sociologist, identified three types of power: charismatic, traditional, and rational/legal. In this essay, we will focus on two types of power relevant to the Procurement department - charismatic power and rational/legal power. Additionally, we will explore how Procurement can responsibly use these powers to help the organization achieve its strategic objectives.
Charismatic power refers to a type of influence or authority that is based on the personal qualities, charisma, and appeal of an individual leader. This form of power arises from the compelling and magnetic personality of a leader, which inspires and motivates followers to willingly and enthusiastically support their vision and goals. One well-known example of a charismatic leader is Steve Jobs, the co-founder of Apple. Charismatic leaders have the ability to inspire and motivate their followers to achieve goals that might seem challenging or even impossible. They often articulate a compelling vision for the future and communicate it in a way that resonates with others. Moreover, they exude confidence and enthusiasm, which can be contagious. Their passion and belief in their vision can energize and mobilize their followers. For this reason, this type of power is often linked with Transformational Leadership styles.
Rational/legal power is derived from established policies, procedures, and regulations that govern business processes. It relies on adherence to legal and ethical standards, ensuring fairness, transparency, and accountability. Rational/legal power is typically exercised in an impersonal and formal manner. Rather than being contingent on the personal qualities of an individual as with charismatic power, rational/ legal power is derived from a person's position within a formal organizational hierarchy. Weber associated rational/legal power with bureaucratic structures, where authority is distributed hierarchically, and individuals hold positions based on their qualifications, expertise, and adherence to established rules. For example, in the Procurement department of an organisation, the Head of Procurement would hold Rational/ Legal power through their ability to sign-off on the activities of others. This form of power emphasizes predictability and consistency in decision-making. Weber points out the downside to this type of power: that leaders with this type of power can be inflexible and rigid.
In an organisation, the Procurement department would use a mixture of charismatic and rational/ legal power in order to help the organisation achieve their strategic objectives. Some ways this could materialise include:
Training: Procurement can use a mixture of charismatic and rational power responsibly by providing training to other departments on aspects of procurement, especially compliance with legislation (which is critical in the public sector) and achieving value for money. This ensures that the organization's practices align with legal requirements and maximize cost-efficiency. Delivering training requires rational power (the training leader needs to know what they're talking about and have experience in this), but also charismatic power in order to engage learners. By training other departments, this will help the organisation achieve its strategic objectives.
Accountability and Reporting: Procurement can responsibly exercise rational/legal power by establishing clear accountability and reporting mechanisms. This includes ensuring that procurement decisions are documented, transparent, and in compliance with relevant laws and regulations. An example of this is creating Standard Operating Procedures, or ensuring Junior members of the team get approval from a Line Manager to conduct certain activities. This helps the organisation achieve strategic goals by eliminating (or significantly reducing) its exposure to risk.
Ethical Sourcing: Procurement can use power to address critical issues such as human trafficking within the supply chain. By setting and enforcing ethical sourcing standards, they contribute to responsible procurement practices. Procurement can use charismatic power to convince senior leadership and supply partners of the importance of ethical sourcing, and legitimate power to ensure that all stakeholders are complying with CSR policies. This could involve the use of gain-share mechanisms in contracts with supply partners.
In conclusion, Procurement departments wield considerable power within organizations, and the key to using this power is balance and responsibility. Charismatic and rational/legal powers can be harnessed to drive and achieve strategic objectives by ensuring ethical, compliant, and efficient procurement practices. By training, identifying vulnerabilities, and promoting responsible sourcing, Procurement contributes to the organization's overall success.
Tutor Notes
- You could bring in many different theories when describing two types of power. I've chosen two by Max Weber (he talks about 3 - charismatic, traditional and rational/ legal). But you could have used some from French and Raven (expert, legitimate, coercive, reward, referent) or Yukl (2010) - connection power and negative power. There are others too, these are just the main ones explored in the study guide
- A similar question was asked in March 22 but power is a big topic so may come up again, either with or without a case study. Another way they could use this topic is discussing ways of using the different power types to overcome issues.
- Weber's Types of Power - p. 171. How procurement can use power responsibly - p.177